Skip to main content

Features

Everything DemandIntel does, and when you would use it

The full reference, in the order the product actually works: conversations come in, they are scored against your framework, the gaps become coaching, the coaching gets managed, and the change gets proved. Each section says who it is for, when you use it and what changes because of it.

Looking for the short version? The platform overview tells the same story in five minutes.

01 Reporting

One master report for your team

A single, defensible view of team performance, built from real conversations rather than opinions.

Who it is for
Sales leaders, managers and team heads who need a clear picture of quality, competency and progress without chasing down spreadsheets.
When you use it
Weekly or monthly, scheduled to run on its own, or on demand when a review lands in the diary.
What it does
Every rep in the date range aggregated into one report: executive summary, quality and competency views, the action plan for the next thirty days, and an evidence library where each claim traces back to a timestamped moment in a real conversation.
Why it matters
Reporting stops being an evening job. Because the report is built from scored conversations rather than opinion, the management picture is already defensible when you walk into the review, and the team sees the same evidence the coaching is based on.
Master reportPreview
AMJLRPTKSNDV
Discovery
Empathy & rapport
Active listening
De-escalation
Resolution & accuracy
Compliance
FoundationProficientAdvancedExpert

02 Insight

The Insights hub

Every chart in one place, filtered the same way, so the comparisons hold.

Who it is for
Managers and heads of sales who want the numbers rather than the advice.
When you use it
When you are preparing for a review, checking a hunch, or working out where to spend the next month of coaching effort.
What it does
A tabbed hub covering quality, competency and per rep trends, all governed by one shared date range and rep filter, so switching tabs never quietly changes the population you are looking at.
Why it matters
Analysis is only useful when it is consistent. Sharing one filter across every view removes the most common source of disagreement, two people reading two slightly different slices of the same data.
Insights hubPreview
AMJLRPTKSNDV
Resolution & accuracy887692698495
Empathy & communication918378957288
Process & compliance749081669379
Verification & disclosures968871849062
Documentation807389778591
Closing & next steps839268887694
At riskDevelopingStrongExcellent

03 Quality

QA scorecards with cited evidence

Consistent scoring at full volume, with evidence, so nobody argues about the mark.

Who it is for
Quality and compliance owners, and the managers who inherit the scores.
When you use it
Continuously, in the background, as conversations arrive.
What it does
Bring your own scorecard, or have one written from your conversations. Items are weighted, compliance breaches can be set to fail the conversation automatically, and every single score is cited back to the moment it came from, with the excerpt and a click through to the conversation.
Why it matters
Manual quality control samples a handful of conversations and still takes days. This scores what actually happened, at volume, and the citation means a challenged score is settled by listening rather than debating.
QA scorecardPreview

Overall QA

86/100

No auto-fail
Resolution & accuracy · 50%88
Empathy & communication · 30%92
Process & compliance · 20%76

Critical / auto-fail items

Identity verification Pass
Required disclosure read Pass
No PII exposed Pass

04 Capability

Competency frameworks

Movement per person becomes visible, instead of assumed.

Who it is for
Managers running development, and enablement teams who have to show a programme worked.
When you use it
Each review cycle, and whenever you are deciding who is ready for more responsibility.
What it does
Four proficiency levels per skill, assessed from real conversations, with the current period shown beside the previous one so the direction of travel is explicit for each person and each skill.
Why it matters
Most capability frameworks are a document nobody scores. This one is scored continuously from evidence, so a development conversation starts from where somebody actually is rather than where they were last assessed.

05 Cadence

Weekly and daily coaching plans

Coaching that arrives without anyone having to prepare it.

Who it is for
Reps, and the managers running the weekly one to one.
When you use it
Every working day. Monday sets the plan for the week, Tuesday to Friday keep it moving.
What it does
One theme for the week and a short daily focus, both drawn from that person's own conversations, delivered by email and in the platform, with progress against the weekly theme tracked as the week goes on.
Why it matters
The reason coaching lapses is preparation time. Removing that step means the cadence survives a busy week, and because the focus comes from that person's own conversations, it never feels like generic training.
Weekly focusPreview

Week of 12 January

Get the cost of the problem on the table

Your focus
DiscoveryProficient

Up 7 points on last week, across 24 scored calls.

Three things to do this week

  • 1Ask what the current process costs, on every first call.
  • 2Listen back to Tuesday 10:04, where it worked.
  • 3Bring one call to your one to one on Thursday.

06 Proof

Continuous improvement plans

An audit trail of behaviour change, not a chart that drifted.

Who it is for
Anyone who has to show the training worked, from the enablement lead to the person signing off the budget.
When you use it
At the end of each coaching sprint, and whenever the value of development spend is questioned.
What it does
The behaviour change ledger records improvement conversation by conversation: the behaviour that was targeted, the conversations before it changed, and the conversations that show it in use afterwards.
Why it matters
A score moving up is not proof, it can move for a dozen reasons. Proving the change one conversation at a time gives you an answer that survives scrutiny.

07 Act

Act coaching management

The coaching plan runs itself, and the manager only makes the decisions.

Who it is for
Frontline managers carrying a team, and the leaders who need to know coaching is actually happening.
When you use it
In the weekly one to one, and in the ten minutes before it.
What it does
A cockpit that orders reps by who needs attention, holds evidence-backed coaching tasks with owners and dates, and keeps a review queue that the system populates automatically with pending evidence pulled from real conversations. Nothing is marked verified or complete without the manager saying so.
Why it matters
Coaching usually fails on administration rather than intent. Act does the finding, the chasing and the record keeping, and leaves the manager with the judgement calls only they can make.
More on Act & Enable
Review queuePreview
Needs a decision3 open
Tom K.2 days waiting

Next step agreed

No agreed next step on 6 of 9 calls

Sofia N.New

Compliance: disclosure

Disclosure missed on 1 call

Jonas L.5 days waiting

Discovery

Improved, ready to close off

08 MCP

DemandIntel inside the tools your team already uses

DemandIntel runs a hosted Model Context Protocol server, so the platform appears as a native tool set inside whichever AI tool your team already works in. One endpoint, one personal access token, no install and no copying data out of the platform.

Who it is for
Enablement and training leads who already spend their day in an AI tool, and technical owners who want the data programmatically rather than through the interface.
When you use it
When the question is unusual enough that no dashboard answers it, when you want to build something out of the findings, and when you want the same numbers available inside the tool you are already writing in.
What it does
Around thirty tools cover conversations, QA scorecards, competency assessments, reports, insights and coaching plans. The tools read the same tenanted data the interface reads, under the same permissions, so an assistant can only see what the person holding the token can see.
Why it matters
It removes the copy and paste step between knowing and doing. Because the assistant is grounded in your team's own scored conversations, what it produces reflects how your team actually sells rather than a generic model of selling.

Works with

Claude CodeClaude DesktopCodexCursorContinueChatGPT desktopany MCP client
Full setup guide

The whole setup

claude mcp add demandintel \
  https://mcp.app.demandintel.io \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer di_pat_…"

Generate the token in Settings, paste it once, and the tools appear in your assistant.

What the tools cover

  • Conversations and transcripts
  • QA scorecards and item level scores
  • Competency assessments and levels
  • Reports and report history
  • Insights and trends
  • Coaching plans, Act programmes and evidence

The loop it closes

01

Query

Ask, in plain language, what is really happening across the team's conversations.

02

Plan

The answer comes from scored conversations, and names the one gap worth fixing first.

03

Create

Your AI tool turns that gap into the session, the notes and the practice material.

04

Deliver

You run the session, grounded in the team's own conversations rather than a generic curriculum.

05

Review

The next scoring cycle shows whether the behaviour actually changed.

09 Training content skill

Turn an identified gap into a session you can run

MCP is the connection. The training content skill is the content. It is a downloadable skill pack that teaches your AI assistant how DemandIntel structures competencies, scorecards and evidence, so the material it writes matches the framework your team is measured against.

Who it is for
Whoever actually builds the training: an enablement manager, a team lead, or an agency running sessions across several clients.
When you use it
After a report or an Act review has named the gap, and before you run the session. It is the step between knowing what is wrong and having something to deliver.
What you get
A session plan, facilitator notes, handouts, conversation scripts and role-play scenarios, all built around the specific behaviours the conversations show are missing, and written in the same language as the scorecard.
Why it matters
Producing the material has always been the slowest part of coaching, which is why gaps stay open for months. This turns a named gap into a runnable session in minutes, and because it uses your framework, the next scoring cycle can tell you whether the session worked.

Route one

One line to install

A single command installs the training skill and wires up the MCP server at the same time, so the assistant has both the method and the data.

curl -fsSL …/install.sh | bash

The exact command, with your token, is shown in Settings once you are signed in.

Route two

Download and drop in

Prefer not to run a script? Download the skill pack and drop the files into your assistant's skills folder. Same content, no installer.

10 Cohorts

The guided programme

Structure and pace alongside the platform, for teams who want to be taken through it.

Who it is for
Teams standing this up for the first time, and leaders who want an external commitment to keep the work moving.
When you use it
At the start, when the habit is being built, or when an existing programme has stalled.
What it does
A guided cohort programme run over a fixed period, working through the maturity stages with your own conversations as the material, alongside other teams doing the same.
Why it matters
Software installs quickly, habits do not. The cohort supplies the pace, the accountability and the worked examples that make the habit stick.
See the cohort programme

11 Community

The practitioner community

A peer group of people solving the same problem, without the vendor in the middle.

Who it is for
Sales leaders, managers and enablement practitioners.
When you use it
Continuously, and particularly when you are designing something new and want to know what has already been tried.
What it does
A working group where frameworks, scorecards and coaching approaches are shared and pressure-tested by people running them for real.
Why it matters
Most enablement teams are small and isolated. Access to people a step ahead saves months of building the wrong thing.
See the community

How it fits together

Nothing here works on its own

Evidence first

Reporting, insight, QA and competency all read the same scored conversations, so a number in the report and a number in Act are the same number.

Then coaching

Weekly and daily plans, Act tasks and the training content skill all take their subject from those scores rather than from a curriculum written in advance.

Then proof

The behaviour change ledger closes the loop, showing conversation by conversation whether the coaching produced a different behaviour.

Want the email cadence that carries all of this? It is described on the platform overview.

Daily coaching emailPreview

From

DemandIntel Coaching

Subject

Today: one change to your discovery questions

This week you are working on

Discovery Proficient

What happened yesterday, 02:41 to 03:38

"So you are looking at a new system. Shall I walk you through what we do?"

You moved to your pitch before finding out what the current process costs them.

Try this on your next call

Asking what the current process costs them each month, before you describe anything you do.

Day+4
Week+7
Month+11

See it against your own conversations

The quickest way to judge any of this is to point it at a fortnight of your team's conversations and read what comes back.